Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Not teaching anymore!

Like Morpheous tells Neo in Matrix, there is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path.

A problem that I had identified earlier with knowing the path and walking the path is the desire for teaching the path. This phenomenon is different from knowing or walking and is the root cause of most problems that we find in the world.

Having known a path, and perhaps even having walked it, people usually want to share the experience with others so that they may experience the same feelings that they have had. What begins as a mission of doing good for others oftens gets lost as the teacher starts believing at some point that there is only one path and that all other paths are wrong. This holds true about all things ... from religion ... to designing a piece of software to what you eat, whether you exercise, where you invest your money, how you comb your hair, the party you vote for, or whether you vote .... the list is endless.

There is a fundamental difference between the way western and eastern cultures look at these paths. We all know "where there is a will there is a way". Here in India, we say (at least I have heard a bong saying) "Joto mot toto poth" ... a rough translation of this would be "as there are opinions there are ways".

The western version seems to imply that "will" is required to create a path ... somewhere implicit in the statement is the fact that a path has to be created, and that it requires will/determination ... force ... the creation of a path requires energy ...

The easter version assumes that there are an infinite number of paths ... and taking a path does not really have to be willful and forceful. It comes as easily as having an opinion. The path exists independent of the traveller.

If you have spent a long time hacking through the undergrowth, fighting faitigue, moaquito bites, snakes and god only knows what else, the attachment to the path that you have created increases ... this is my path ... I created it ... and from this perhaps is born the missionary zeal to herd other prople along it, irrespective of where it leads to or whether it is even complete ... ofcourse, herding people along the path (in continuation of the allegory) prevents the path from getting over grown again and leaves it open.

Now, if the path is something that you take for granted, like a six lane highway that is open all the time, and which will stay irrespective of whether other people use it or not, the choices are more. At every intersection, you are more open to the idea of turning right or left, changing lanes or stopping for a coffee. Creation of the path ceases to become the journey. The journey becomes distinct and separate from the process of path creation and at times even oblivious of it. Someone keen on travelling rather than creating a path does not really worry about how many people he has along with him ... except for company perhaps ... and many are quite fine with the solitude that gives them the time to think what they will, eat what they will, listen to whatever song they wish to, and have the ac turned on or off. If whatever path thy have taken is used so little that it closes behind them they don't need to worry about that either for it shall open again when the next traveller comes along.

Our perception of reality is the only reality we know. It would perhaps be wrong for me to say that most people are grappling with the western paradigm as opposed to the eastern one in their everyday lives. However, for me personally, this shift has taken place. It has dawned on me (slowly) that I have shifted ... I don't know when or how or why ... but somewhere in the last 8 years, I have shifted from the eastern to the western paradigm ... and because most of my other fundamental believes are still based in eastern ethos, it has createdan imbalance ... for this is akin to a portion of the foundation having shifted, leaving a lot of the superstructure in thin air!

Awareness is only the first step ... though it is vital. Once you are aware of what is happening, you can decide what to do about it. For me, the thing to do is to go back to the eastern way.

It means a lot to me to get back there, the primary of which is peace of mind. For then, you may decide not to litter the streets and reach every appointment on time but you stop expecting other people to do so. You may follow traffic rules, but you do not hold it against others when they don't. You may believe in what you think is basic human decency, but you are ok with what others perceive it to be.

To me, this paradigm shift means that I do not need to go through the pain of having to hold on to my beliefs in a world where other numerous contradictory beliefs exist, it also saves from the pain of changing my own beliefs to be in sync with that of the majority. Escapist? Not really. All that the paradigm shift removes is the pain and the inflexibility. I shall still hold on to my beliefs but not with pain, and I shall still change when required but sans pain.

I can never get over what Carl Segan penned ... "we are butterflies who flutter for a day and think it is eternity ..." though the context was entirely different, it never fails to put life into proper perspective.

Life is a journey, it is about taking whatever path you choose ... it may mean walking a path, knowing a path, being oblivious to the concept that there are paths, or not choosing ... very open ended ... it may also be about teaching ... however, I shall not teach. I do not want any converts to my path, and to my definitions of right living and right thinking.

Freedom at midnight? Naaaahhh .... freedom at midday actually :)

4 comments:

  1. Shucks gyaan gyaan and some more gyaan!!
    how does ur gurl bear u i wonder :P

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hmmm.. sounds like self centered.. though I like the idea of live and let live, paths either created by oneself or a six lane highway created by somebody else cannot just be used or misused or for that matter lay unused. If I create a path and I have the conviction that it is a fairly decent path, I would educate others about it. It is for them to follow it or not.. but does not mean I will not "teach".

    Faith's, beliefs, revolutions and many more changes have been brought out by a whole bunch of people following a path shown by one, albeit there are negative instances too.

    With the example of the six lane highway, I would not see a guy driving on the shoulder and turn a blind eye. It is not being tolerable by doing it, it is actually shunning away once responsibility. I, as a responsible user of the highway, would try to educate to the best of my capacity to make him drive on the road and not on the shoulder. If no one was tolerant, then there would be no one to take the shoulder. People take to the shoulder as there are tolerant people.

    BTW this should be true in all cultures. East or West

    ReplyDelete
  3. :)

    well, the problem is where do you draw the line ... if you tell someone who is driving on the shoulder to drive on the road, that is fine ... but what next?

    If the person listens to all that you have to say but still insists on driving on the shoulder, do you tell him again? and again? and again? and if he still does not listen, do you get angry?

    I am actually ok with teaching and preaching ... what bothers me is how we react when someone we have taught decides not to follow us. Should we enforce what we think is right on others? What gives us that right?

    Actually, the next post that I was writing on is about understanding and agreeing ... how people feel you cannot have understood them perfectly unless you agree ... you can understand and yet not agree ...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi, great job on blogging. Keep up with it. Cheers

    ReplyDelete